ClickOnce vs Updater Application Block

Topics: Updater Application Block
Dec 7, 2005 at 10:35 AM
originally posted by: cyberstrike

I am noticing that clickonce is missing a lot of features that I need. Such as the ability to install the application outside the cache and installation per-machine, not per-user.

The Updater Application Block appears like it would be a more extensible solution for my needs; however, I was wondering if it was going to be maintained and developed to work with Framework 2.0. Is the implementation of ClickOnce going to cause the Updater Application Block to become unmaintained?